Retórica, dialética e lógica: a inútil busca por uma distinção essencial

  • Charlotte Jørgensen Universidade de Copenhagen
Palavras-chave: Teoria da argumentação, Dialética, Lógica, Retórica

Resumo

Tomando como ponto de partida a recente contribuição de Blair ao debate sobre a tríade, o artigo discute e desafia tentativas de reduzir a intrincada relação entre retórica, dialética e lógica a uma tricotomia com compartimentos estanques ou separá-los com um único critério totalmente nítido. Argumento que os esforços para apontar uma diferença essencial, entre as várias diferenças típicas parcialmente fundamentadas em tradições disciplinares, obscurecem as complexidades existentes em cada campo. negligenciadas tanto as propriedades transversais dos campos como as possibilidades de pontes teóricas entre eles.

Referências

BITZER, Lloyd F. The Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-14, 1968.

BLAIR, J. Anthony. The Limits of the Dialogue Model of Argument. Argumentation, n. 12, p. 325-339, 1998.

BLAIR, J. Anthony. Rhetoric, Dialectic, and Logic as Related to Argument. Philosophy and Rhetoric, n. 45, p. 148-164, 2012.

DIECKMANN, Walther. Politische Sprache, politische Kommunikation. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag, 1981.

EEMEREN, Frans H. van; HOUTLOSSER, Peter. Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance. In: EEMEREN, Frans H. van; HOUTLOSSER, Peter (eds.). Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argument Analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002. p. 131-159.

FRENTZ, Thomas S. Rhetorical Conversation, Time, and Moral Action. In: LUCAITES, John Louis; CONDIT, Celeste Michele; CAUDILL, Sally (eds.). Contemporary Rhetorical Theory: A Reader. New York: The Guilford Press, 1999 [1985]. p. 288-305.

GILBERT Michael A. Commentary on: Charlotte Jørgensen’s “Rhetoric, Dialectic, and Logic: The Triad Decompartmentalized”. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE ONTARIO SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF ARGUMENTATION (OSSA), 10, 2013, Windsor, Proceedings […]. Windsor: OSSA, 2014. p. 1-4 (CD-ROM).

HAUSER, Gerald A. Introduction to Rhetorical Theory. 2.ed. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press, 2002.

JOHNSON, Ralph H. Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000.

JOHNSON, Ralph H. Revisiting the Logical/dialectical/rhetorical Triumvirate. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE ONTARIO SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF ARGUMENTATION (OSSA), 09, 2009, Windsor, Proceedings […]. Windsor: OSSA, 2009. p. 1-13 (CD-ROM).

JOHNSON, Ralph H. Revisitando o triunvirato lógica/dialética/retórica. Tradução: Eduardo Lopes Piris e Paulo Roberto Gonçalves-Segundo. EID&A - Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e Argumentação, Ilhéus, n. 20, v. 1, p. 254-273, 2020 [2009]. DOI https://doi.org/10.17648/eidea-20-2708.

JØRGENSEN, Charlotte. Debattens væsen og uvæsen: Om fjendtlighed i offentlig debat. Retorik Studier, n. 10, p. 3-43, 1995.

JØRGENSEN, Charlotte. Public Debate – An Act of Hostility? Argumentation, n. 12, p. 431-443, 1998.

JØRGENSEN, Charlotte. The Relevance of Intention in Argument Evaluation. Argumentation, n. 21, p. 165-174, 2007.

JØRGENSEN, Charlotte. Argumentation. In: JØRGENSEN, Charlotte; VILLADSEN, Lisa (eds.). Retorik. Teori og praksis. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur, 2009. p. 129-158).

JØRGENSEN, Charlotte. Rhetoric, Dialectic and Logic: The Triad Decompartmentalized. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE ONTARIO SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF ARGUMENTATION (OSSA), 10, 2013, Windsor, Proceedings […]. Windsor: OSSA, 2014. p. 1-9 (CD-ROM).

KENNEDY, George A. Aristotle - On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.

KLEIN, Josef. Zur Rhetorik politischer Fernsehdiskussionen. In: UEDING, Gert (ed.). Rhetorik zwischen den Wissenschaften: Geschichte, System, Praxis als Probleme des “Historischen Wörterbuchs der Rhetorik”. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1991. p. 353-362.

KOCK, Christian. Norms of Legitimate Dissensus. Informal Logic, n. 27, p. 179-196, 2007.

KOCK, Christian. Choice is not True or False: The Domain of Rhetorical Argumentation. Argumentation, n. 23, p. 61-80, 2009.

KRABBE, Erik C. W. Meeting in the House of Callias: Rhetoric and Dialectic. Argumentation, n. 14, p. 205-217, 2000.

LEFF, Michael. Rhetoric and Dialectic in the Twenty-first Century. Argumentation, n. 14, p. 241-254, 2000.

LEFF, Michael. Rhetoric, Dialectic, and the Functions of Argument. In: HOUTLOSSER, Peter et al (eds). Considering Pragma-Dialectics: A festschrift for Frans H. van Eemeren on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006. p. 199-209.

McADON, Brad. Rhetoric is Counterpart of Dialectic [ Ή ῥητορική ἐστιν ἀντίστροφος τῇ διαλεκτικῇ]. Philosophy and Rhetoric, n. 34, p. 113-150, 2001.

PERELMAN, Chaïm. The New Rhetoric and the Rhetoricians: Remembrances and Comments. Quarterly Journal of Speech, n. 70, p. 188-196, 1984.

PERELMAN, Chaïm; OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, Lucie. The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.

TINDALE, Christopher W. Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999.

TOULMIN, Stephen. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.

TOULMIN, Stephen. The Tyranny of Principles. The Hasting Center Report, v. 11, n. 6, p. 31-39, 1981.

TOULMIN, Stephen. Return to Reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.

WENZEL, Joseph. Three Perspectives on Argument: Rhetoric, Dialectic, Logic. In: TRAPP, Robert; SCHUETZ, Janice (eds.). Perspectives on Argumentation. Essays in Honor of Wayne Brockriede. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press, 1990. p. 9-26.

Publicado
2021-04-30
Como Citar
Jørgensen, C. (2021). Retórica, dialética e lógica: a inútil busca por uma distinção essencial. Revista Eletrônica De Estudos Integrados Em Discurso E Argumentação, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.47369/eidea-21-1-3014
Seção
Tradução